Thomas O'donnell, of the Estate of Corwin D. Denney v. Paul H. Smith
Opinion
June 30, 2006
Mr. Vincent L. Marable III Paul Webb, P.C. 221 N. Houston Street Wharton, TX 77488 Mr. Casey L. Dobson Scott Douglass & McConnico, L.L.P. 600 Congress Ave., Suite 1500 Austin, TX 78701
RE: Case Number: 05-0072 Court of Appeals Number: 04-04-00108-CV Trial Court Number: 2002-CI-00925
Style: THOMAS O'DONNELL, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF CORWIN D. DENNEY v. PAUL H. SMITH, ET AL.
Dear Counsel:
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court vacates the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to that court and delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above- referenced cause. (Justice Green not sitting)
Sincerely, [pic]
Andrew Weber, Clerk
by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk Enclosures |cc:|Mr. Dan Crutchfield | | |Ms. Margaret G. | | |Montemayor |
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas O'donnell, of the Estate of Corwin D. Denney v. Paul H. Smith (Thomas O'donnell, of the Estate of Corwin D. Denney v. Paul H. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.