Thomas N. O'Hara v. People of State of California
This text of 390 F.2d 878 (Thomas N. O'Hara v. People of State of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
390 F.2d 878
Thomas N. O'HARA, Appellant,
v.
PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Appellee.
No. 21682.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
February 15, 1968.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Sherrill Halbert, Judge.
Carl B. Shapiro (argued), San Anselmo, Cal., Vincent Hallinan, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Nelson Kempsky (argued), Deputy Atty. Gen., Thomas Lynch, Atty. Gen., Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The appeal from the district court's dismissal of appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for petitioner's failure to exhaust his state remedies within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
390 F.2d 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-n-ohara-v-people-of-state-of-california-ca9-1968.