Thomas N. Baker Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Mill & Lumber Co.

107 S.E. 899, 27 Ga. App. 145, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 737
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas N. Baker Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Mill & Lumber Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 749
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1921·No. 11678·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

When this case was first before this court (24 Ga. App. 749, 102 S. E. 135), it was held, that, “ as the evidence admitted made a prima facie case for the plaintiff, it was error for the trial judge to grant a nonsuit.” This ruling became the law of the case, and we are bound by it. We do not find such a material difference in the evidence on the two trials as to authorize us now to say that the trial judge did not err in granting a nonsuit on the last trial, especially in view of the evidence of the plaintiff in reference to certain commissions.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas N. Baker Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Mill & Lumber Co., 107 S.E. 899, 27 Ga. App. 145, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 737 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

107 S.E. 899 (Thomas N. Baker Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Mill & Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas N. Baker Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Mill & Lumber Co.
102 S.E. 135 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)