THOMAS MULCAHEY VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES (TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided June 3, 2019·No. A-5146-16T2·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-5146-16T2

THOMAS MULCAHEY, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND,

Respondent-Respondent.

Argued February 4, 2019 – Decided June 3, 2019 Before Judges Messano, Fasciale and Gooden Brown.

On appeal from the Board of Trustees of the Teachers'

Pension and Annuity Fund, Department of the Treasury, TPAF No. 1-10-156216.

Richard A. Friedman argued the cause for appellant (Zazzali, Fagella, Nowak, Kleinbaum & Friedman, attorneys; Richard A. Friedman, of counsel and on the briefs; Edward M. Suarez, Jr., on the briefs).

Amy Chung, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General, attorney; Melissa H. Raksa, Assistant

Attorney General, of counsel; Jeff S. Ignatowitz, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

PER CURIAM Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 18A:66-39(c) (the Act), a member of the Teachers'

Pension and Annuity Fund (TPAF) is eligible for accidental disability benefits if he or she "is permanently and totally disabled as a direct result of a traumatic event occurring during and as a result of the performance of his regular or assigned duties . . . ." (emphasis added); 1 see Kasper v. Bd. of Trs., Teachers' Pension & Annuity Fund, 164 N.J. 564, 575-76 (2000) (discussing elements of a successful claim for accidental disability benefits and 1966 statutory amendments enacted to "make the granting of an accidental disability pension more difficult"). In 1986, the Legislature amended the Act, adding the following:

A traumatic event occurring during voluntary performance of regular or assigned duties at a place of employment before or after required hours of employment which is not in violation of any valid work rule of the employer or otherwise prohibited by the employer shall be deemed as occurring during the performance of regular or assigned duties.

[L. 1986, c. 51 (1986 Amendment) (emphases added).]

1 After May 21, 2010, no new member of the TPAF is eligible for accidental disability benefits. L. 2010, c. 3, § 7.

A-5146-16T2

"The purpose of the 1986 amendment . . . was not to alter the statutory requirements for an accidental disability pension, but to make the legal ramifications of the performance of an employee's duties either before or after hours the same as if it occurred during the regular school day." Kasper, 164 N.J. at 585 n.5 (citation omitted).

This appeal presents primarily a legal question. Is a high school teacher, paid a stipend under a separate contract to coach one of the school's athletic teams, who becomes "permanently and totally disabled as a direct result of a traumatic event" during after-school practice, eligible for accidental disability benefits because the "traumatic event occurr[ed] during and as a result of . . . his regular or assigned duties . . . [?]" N.J.S.A. 18A:66-39(c). The facts are essentially undisputed.

Thomas Mulcahey first became an athletic coach in the Freehold Regional High School District in the fall of 1991. Two years later, the District hired him as a high school physical education teacher. He continued his duties thereafter as a coach, and, during the 2006-07 school year, the District hired Mulcahey as the head coach for the girls' varsity softball team. Each year, the District would evaluate a coach's performance, the evaluations were forwarded through the chain of command to the District superintendent, and before hiring coaches, the

A-5146-16T2

District reviewed applications whether submitted by those who had previousl y coached or new applicants.

The District paid coaches a stipend, which was not included as pensionable salary, and the District therefore did not deduct pension contributions from the stipend. In this case, the collective negotiations agreement between the Board of Education and the teachers' bargaining unit established the amount of the stipend paid to Mulcahey. The District's coaching manual contained a broad "Philosophy Statement," which specified that the "fundamental purpose of interscholastic athletics" was, among other things, to "foster the intellectual growth of the student by supporting and reinforcing the academic program of the school." It further stated, "[f]unctioning as a part of the educational whole[,] the athletic program should always be in conformity with the District's objectives."

A contractual responsibility of the softball coach was to supervise after -

school practices. During practice on April 11, 2007 (2007 incident), Mulcahey was struck in the face by an "errant throw," causing a concussion and fracturing the zygomatic arch of his face in three places. He also suffered herniated discs, cognitive and vision problems, depression, and anxiety. As a result, Mulcahey

A-5146-16T2

took leave until January 2008. Upon his return, he claimed he was unable to cope with the stresses of the job.

On March 30, 2009 (2009 incident), Mulcahey suffered a concussion when, during a physical education class, a "spiked" volleyball hit his head. Mulcahey did not return to work until October. In April 2011, he submitted an application for accidental disability benefits, claiming he was permanently disabled as a result of both incidents. He continued to coach and teach until 2014, when he left because of his asserted disability.

The TPAF Board of Trustees (Board) initially denied Mulcahey's request for accidental disability benefits, concluding he was not "totally and permanently disabled." In 2014, based on supplemental medical evidence, the Board partially reversed its earlier decision. It concluded Mulcahey was "totally and permanently disabled[,]" but it denied him accidental disability benefits.

The Board reasoned that although the 2009 incident "occurred during and as a result of the performance of [Mulcahey's] regular or assigned duties[,] there [was] no evidence . . . of direct causation of a total and permanent disability based on the [2009] incident . . . ." As to the 2007 incident, "which was the substantial contributing cause of [Mulcahey's] disability," the Board concluded it "did not occur during and as a result of his regular and assigned duties[,]"

A-5146-16T2

because "coaching . . . [was] not part of [Mulcahey's] regular and assigned job duties."2 Mulcahey appealed again. 3 Both parties moved for summary decision, acknowledging that the issue presented a legal question, which the ALJ framed succinctly:

It is [Mulcahey's] position that in respect to the Board's determination that [the] 2007 injury, sustained during the performance of his coaching duties while on the school's athletic field, does not qualify as having occurred during the performance of his regular or assigned duties, Kasper has already determined that the Board's position is unsustainable. The Board attempts to argue otherwise.

Relying heavily on the Court's dicta in Kasper, the ALJ rendered a comprehensive initial decision finding Mulcahey was eligible for accidental disability benefits. The Board rejected the ALJ's decision, finding it was "not consistent with Kasper[, but] rather . . . [was] an unwarranted expansion of

2 The Board misstated the statutory qualification as relating to "regular and assigned duties," whereas N.J.S.A. 18A:66-39(c) refers to "regular or assigned duties." 3 The parties agreed before the administrative law judge (ALJ) to first litigate whether Mulcahey was eligible for accidental disability benefits occasioned by the 2007 incident, and hold in abeyance the 2009 incident, litigating that only if Mulcahey was unsuccessful.

A-5146-16T2

Kasper." It remanded the matter to the ALJ to develop a "full and complete administrative record" before the Board conducted its review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMAS MULCAHEY VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES (TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND), (N.J. Ct. App. 2019).

THOMAS MULCAHEY VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES (TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND) (THOMAS MULCAHEY VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES (TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Herrmann
926 A.2d 350 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2007)
Kasper v. TEACHERS'PEN. & ANN. FUND
754 A.2d 525 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2000)
Russo v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, POLICE.
17 A.3d 801 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)
Casey Piatt v. Police and Firemen's Retirement
127 A.3d 716 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2015)
Jaclyn Thompson v. Board of Trustees, Teachers'
158 A.3d 1195 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2017)
Thompson v. Bd. of Trs.
184 A.3d 455 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2018)
State v. Twiggs
187 A.3d 123 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2018)
Kocanowski v. Twp. of Bridgewater
203 A.3d 95 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2019)