Thomas Michel III v. Salesforce, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 7, 2012·No. A12A2281·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,_________________ August 07, 2012

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A12A2281. THOMAS MICHEL III v. SALESFORCE, INC.

This case originated as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling, Thomas Michel III appealed the magistrate court’s decision to the superior court. The superior court subsequently entered judgment against Michel, who filed a notice of direct appeal to this Court. We lack jurisdiction. Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Michel was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/07/2012 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,_________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas Michel III v. Salesforce, Inc., (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).

Thomas Michel III v. Salesforce, Inc. (Thomas Michel III v. Salesforce, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

English v. Delbridge
454 S.E.2d 175 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)