Thomas McNeil v. State of Florida
This text of Thomas McNeil v. State of Florida (Thomas McNeil v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D21-2283 _____________________________
THOMAS MCNEIL,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.
September 22, 2021
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293, 296–97 (Fla. 1977) (explaining that prohibition “is preventive and not corrective,” the purpose of which “is to prevent the doing of something, not to compel the undoing of something already done”); Sparkman v. McClure, 498 So. 2d 892, 895 (Fla. 1986) (explaining that prohibition “cannot be utilized to revoke an order already entered” and that it “will not lie where the proceedings below have already been completed”).
RAY, JAY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Thomas McNeil, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas McNeil v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-mcneil-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.