Thomas McClendon v. the State of Texas
This text of Thomas McClendon v. the State of Texas (Thomas McClendon v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-25-00368-CR
THOMAS MCCLENDON, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 396th District Court Tarrant County, Texas1 Trial Court No. 1826633, Honorable Vincent Giardino, Presiding
December 19, 2025 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Thomas McClendon, proceeding pro se, appeals his conviction for
evading arrest or detention using a motor vehicle2 and sentence to fifteen years of
confinement. The clerk’s record has been filed, but the reporter’s record remains
outstanding due to Appellant’s failure to pay for its preparation. Pending before the Court
1 Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by
the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. 2 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 38.04(b)(2)(A). is Appellant’s motion requesting the appointment of appellate counsel and a free
reporter’s record due to his claimed indigence.
We abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to rule on Appellant’s
motion and determine:
(1) whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
(2) whether Appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel pursuant to
article 1.051(d)(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure; and
(3) whether Appellant is entitled to have the reporter’s record furnished without
charge pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.2.
The trial court shall enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned
questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a supplemental clerk’s
record and cause that record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court by January 20, 2026.
If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and is
entitled to appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel; the name, address,
email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly appointed counsel
shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas McClendon v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-mcclendon-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.