Thomas Mayhew v. the State of Texas
This text of Thomas Mayhew v. the State of Texas (Thomas Mayhew v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-21-00075-CR
THOMAS RAY MAYHEW, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 320th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 58,954-D, Honorable Pamela C. Sirmon, Presiding
June 30, 2021 ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
In 2009, appellant Thomas Ray Mayhew was convicted of criminal trespass and
sentenced to sixty days’ confinement in county jail. On March 22, 2021, the trial court
signed a nunc pro tunc judgment of conviction. Appellant appeals pro se, from the nunc
pro tunc judgment. Because the clerk’s record has yet to be filed, we remand the cause
for further proceedings.
The appellate record was originally due May 21, 2021. The reporter’s record,
transcribing appellant’s 2009 plea hearing, has been filed. The clerk’s record has not been filed, however, because appellant has not paid for its preparation. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 35.3(a)(2). By letter of May 28, 2021, we directed appellant to make payment
arrangements for the clerk’s record by June 11. Failure to do so, we advised, would result
in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further
proceedings. Appellant has failed to make payment arrangements for the clerk’s record
to date.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2). Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means it
finds necessary to determine the following:
(1) whether appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
(2) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to have the clerk’s record
furnished without charge (along with appellate counsel); and
(3) if appellant is not entitled to have the clerk’s record furnished without
charge, the date appellant will make acceptable payment arrangements for
the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a clerk’s
record and cause that record to be filed with this court by July 30, 2021. Should further
time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before July 30,
2021.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas Mayhew v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-mayhew-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.