Thomas Matherly v. Justin Andrews

692 F. App'x 733
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas Matherly v. Justin Andrews. Read the opinion of the Court — 817 F.3d 115
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 10, 2017·No. 17-6270·Unpublished

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Shane Matherly, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order determining, after remand from this court, that Matherly was in the legal custody of the Bureau of Prisons when the government filed a certificate designating Math-erly as a sexually dangerous person, and therefore denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matherly v. Andrews, No. 5:13-hc-02077-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas Matherly v. Justin Andrews, 692 F. App'x 733 (4th Cir. 2017).

692 F. App'x 733 (Thomas Matherly v. Justin Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241