Thomas-Mack, Inc. v. Ursula Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thomas-Mack, Inc. v. Ursula Holding Corp.

5 A.D.2d 837, 170 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7072

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 837 (Thomas-Mack, Inc. v. Ursula Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas-Mack, Inc. v. Ursula Holding Corp., 5 A.D.2d 837, 170 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7072 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for fraudulent representations and for breach of an employment contract, the appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the two causes of action pleaded in the second amended complaint for insufficiency and to dismiss the second cause on the further ground that no leave to amend had been granted. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for fraudulent representations and for breach of an employment contract, the appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the two causes of action pleaded in the second amended complaint for insufficiency and to dismiss the second cause on the further ground that no leave to amend had been granted. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion.

Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 837, 170 N.Y.S.2d 926, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-mack-inc-v-ursula-holding-corp-nyappdiv-1958.