Thomas M. Walsh v. United States
220 F.2d 488, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 123, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3382
Opinion
The question is whether a forfeited recognizance is a judgment within the meaning of D.C.Code 1951, § 15-101, 31 Stat. 1381. We agree with the District Court that it is not. Cf. D.C.Code 1951, § 15-103, 31 Stat. 1381.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas M. Walsh v. United States, 220 F.2d 488, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 123, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3382 (D.C. Cir. 1955).
220 F.2d 488 (Thomas M. Walsh v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.