Thomas M. Bismark v. Department of Corrections

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 17, 2014
Docket13-5862
StatusPublished

This text of Thomas M. Bismark v. Department of Corrections (Thomas M. Bismark v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas M. Bismark v. Department of Corrections, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

THOMAS M. BISMARK, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D13-5862

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed December 11, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Thomas M. Bismark, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Daniel A. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thomas M. Bismark v. Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-m-bismark-v-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2014.