Thomas Lovelady v. State
This text of Thomas Lovelady v. State (Thomas Lovelady v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,__________________ August 28, 2014
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A15A0024. THOMAS LOVELADY v. THE STATE.
Thomas Lovelady was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to fifteen
years, to serve ten in incarceration and the remainder on probation. We affirmed his
conviction on appeal. Lovelady v. State, 307 Ga. App. 788 (706 SE2d 148) (2011).
He later filed a motion to set aside a void judgment and conviction. The trial court
denied the motion, and Lovelady appeals. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
“[A] petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate
remedy in a criminal case.” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786)
(2009). Any appeal from an order denying such a motion must be dismissed. See
Harper, supra; Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). A direct appeal
may lie from an order denying a motion to correct a void sentence, but only if the
defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void or illegal. See
Harper, supra at n.1; Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009).
And a sentence is void only when the trial court imposes punishment that the law
does not allow. Jordan v. State, 253 Ga. App. 510, 511 (1) (559 SE2d 528) (2002). In his motion, Lovelady argued that his indictment was defectively vague and
that it was not clear which penal clause applied to his sentence. But Lovelady’s
sentence fell squarely within the range of “not less than ten nor more than 20”
prescribed for armed robbery under OCGA § 16-8-41 (b), and he has not argued
otherwise. Because Lovelady has not raised a colorable void-sentence claim, this
appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/28/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas Lovelady v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-lovelady-v-state-gactapp-2014.