Thomas Leo Novotny v. Luis R. Hernandez, Individually, and D/B/A Luis R. Hernandez, L.L.C., 3901 Entertainment Corporation and Edriga, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 4, 2004
Docket13-04-00021-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Thomas Leo Novotny v. Luis R. Hernandez, Individually, and D/B/A Luis R. Hernandez, L.L.C., 3901 Entertainment Corporation and Edriga, Inc. (Thomas Leo Novotny v. Luis R. Hernandez, Individually, and D/B/A Luis R. Hernandez, L.L.C., 3901 Entertainment Corporation and Edriga, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas Leo Novotny v. Luis R. Hernandez, Individually, and D/B/A Luis R. Hernandez, L.L.C., 3901 Entertainment Corporation and Edriga, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-021-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_____ ____________________________________________________

THOMAS LEO NOVOTNY,                                                 Appellant,


v.


LUIS R. HERNANDEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A

LUIS R. HERNANDEZ, L.L.C. AND 3901 ENTERTAINMENT

CORPORATION AND EDRIGA, INC.,                                   Appellees.

_______________ __________________________________________


On appeal from the 404th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________ __________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, THOMAS LEO NOVOTNY, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2003-02-1131-G. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant filed a motion to withdraw appeal. In the motion, appellant states that he no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to withdraw appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant’s motion to withdraw appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

                                                               PER CURIAM

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 4th day of March, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thomas Leo Novotny v. Luis R. Hernandez, Individually, and D/B/A Luis R. Hernandez, L.L.C., 3901 Entertainment Corporation and Edriga, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-leo-novotny-v-luis-r-hernandez-individually-texapp-2004.