Thomas Kizer Jr v. Judicial Tenure Commission
This text of Thomas Kizer Jr v. Judicial Tenure Commission (Thomas Kizer Jr v. Judicial Tenure Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 24, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160750(21) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein THOMAS KIZER, JR. and Elizabeth T. Clement DANIEL A. BURRESS, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices Plaintiffs, v SC: 160750 JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION, Defendant. _________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs to file a reply to the answer to the motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. The reply submitted on April 8, 2020, is accepted for filing.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 24, 2020
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas Kizer Jr v. Judicial Tenure Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-kizer-jr-v-judicial-tenure-commission-mich-2020.