Thomas Johnson, Inc. v. State Insurance

50 A.D.3d 1544, 855 N.Y.S.2d 396
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 25, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered February 26, 2007 in a declaratory judgment action. The judgment, among other things, granted in part plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. We add only that defendant’s contention that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction over this declaratory judgment action is without merit (see CFLR 3001; cf. D’Angelo v State Ins. Fund, 48 AD3d 400 [2008]; see generally Hattock v State of New York, 32 NY2d 599, 603 [1973]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Smith and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas Johnson, Inc. v. State Insurance, 50 A.D.3d 1544, 855 N.Y.S.2d 396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

50 A.D.3d 1544 (Thomas Johnson, Inc. v. State Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas Johnson, Inc. v. State Insurance Fund
67 A.D.3d 1362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)