Thomas, Johnie Ray

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 20, 2014
DocketWR-78,190-02
StatusPublished

This text of Thomas, Johnie Ray (Thomas, Johnie Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas, Johnie Ray, (Tex. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-78,190-02

EX PARTE JOHNIE THOMAS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W-15,556-C-2 IN THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT FROM RANDALL COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault

and sentenced to twelve years’ imprisonment. His direct appeal was dismissed for want of

jurisdiction. Thomas v. State, 07-11-00460-CR (Tex. App.–Amarillo Jan. 13, 2012).

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. The State agrees that Applicant was denied his right to appeal and

recommends that Applicant be given relief.

Counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We find that Applicant is entitled to the 2

opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 15,556-C from

the 251st District Court of Randall County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he

may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful

appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall

be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court

issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps

to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court

issues. Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. Ex Parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1997).

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: August 20, 2014 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thomas, Johnie Ray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-johnie-ray-texcrimapp-2014.