Thomas Jay Dangerfield v. Jacob Ormsby and Academy, Ltd.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-07-033-CV
THOMAS JAY DANGERFIELD APPELLANT
V.
JACOB ORMSBY AND ACADEMY, LTD. APPELLEES
----------
FROM THE 342 ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
On April 10, 2007, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). T EX. R. A PP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.
Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.
DELIVERED: May 3, 2007
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas Jay Dangerfield v. Jacob Ormsby and Academy, Ltd. (Thomas Jay Dangerfield v. Jacob Ormsby and Academy, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.