Thomas Jay Dangerfield v. Jacob Ormsby and Academy, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 3, 2007·No. 02-07-00033-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-07-033-CV

THOMAS JAY DANGERFIELD APPELLANT

V.

JACOB ORMSBY AND ACADEMY, LTD. APPELLEES

----------

FROM THE 342 ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

On April 10, 2007, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a).  T EX. R. A PP. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.   See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED:  May 3, 2007

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas Jay Dangerfield v. Jacob Ormsby and Academy, Ltd., (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Thomas Jay Dangerfield v. Jacob Ormsby and Academy, Ltd. (Thomas Jay Dangerfield v. Jacob Ormsby and Academy, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.