Home/Ninth Circuit/THOMAS JAMES WELCH, — v. THOMAS CAREY, WARDEN

THOMAS JAMES WELCH, — v. THOMAS CAREY, WARDEN

341 F.3d 869, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 9521, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17251, 2003 WL 22014585
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 21, 2003
Docket00-15366
StatusPublished

This text of 341 F.3d 869 (THOMAS JAMES WELCH, — v. THOMAS CAREY, WARDEN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
THOMAS JAMES WELCH, — v. THOMAS CAREY, WARDEN, 341 F.3d 869, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 9521, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17251, 2003 WL 22014585 (9th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
341 F.3d 869 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 F.3d 869, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 9521, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17251, 2003 WL 22014585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-james-welch-v-thomas-carey-warden-ca9-2003.