Thomas J. Depietro, T/d/b/a Depietro's Pharmacy v. Drug Enforcement Administration
This text of 911 F.2d 819 (Thomas J. Depietro, T/d/b/a Depietro's Pharmacy v. Drug Enforcement Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
911 F.2d 819
286 U.S.App.D.C. 77
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Thomas J. DePIETRO, t/d/b/a DePietro's Pharmacy, Petitioner,
v.
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Respondent
No. 89-1397.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Aug. 27, 1990.
Before BUCKLEY, SENTELLE and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This case was considered on the record on a petition for review of an order of the Drug Enforcement Administration and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied. While the Administrator may have erroneously concluded that petitioner's pharmacy permit was invalid under Pennsylvania law, his decision to revoke the Certificate of Registration was not arbitrary and capricious as it was also based on petitioner's conviction for illegal distribution of controlled substances. See Fitzhugh v. Drug Enforcement Agency, 813 F.2d 1248, 1253 (D.C.Cir.1987).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
911 F.2d 819, 286 U.S. App. D.C. 77, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15446, 1990 WL 125680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-j-depietro-tdba-depietros-pharmacy-v-drug-e-cadc-1990.