Thomas J. Conboy v. Mary Alice Kelly

Fourth Circuit

Thomas J. Conboy v. Mary Alice Kelly

59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23399, 1995 WL 370784

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1995

Docket95-1351

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 166 (Thomas J. Conboy v. Mary Alice Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas J. Conboy v. Mary Alice Kelly, 59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23399, 1995 WL 370784 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Thomas J. CONBOY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Mary Alice KELLY, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-1351.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 20, 1995.

Thomas J. Conboy, Appellant Pro Se. James Patrick Gillece, Jr., MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, MD; James F. Horne, BOYCE, HORNE & JONES, L.C., St. Louis, MO, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his amended complaint on the basis of improper venue. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Conboy v. Kelly, No. CA-93-4148-B (D. Md. Feb. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Thomas J. CONBOY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Mary Alice KELLY, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-1351.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 20, 1995.

Thomas J. Conboy, Appellant Pro Se. James Patrick Gillece, Jr., MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, MD; James F. Horne, BOYCE, HORNE & JONES, L.C., St. Louis, MO, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his amended complaint on the basis of improper venue. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Conboy v. Kelly, No. CA-93-4148-B (D. Md. Feb. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 166, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23399, 1995 WL 370784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-j-conboy-v-mary-alice-kelly-ca4-1995.