Thomas J. Blankenship v. Roy Davis, Frank Kapavik and Brent Ewing
This text of Thomas J. Blankenship v. Roy Davis, Frank Kapavik and Brent Ewing (Thomas J. Blankenship v. Roy Davis, Frank Kapavik and Brent Ewing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11-00026-CV
THOMAS J. BLANKENSHIP, Appellant v.
ROY DAVIS, FRANK KAPAVIK AND BRENT EWING, Appellees
From the 170th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-4246-4
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant has filed a “Motion to Dismiss.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it
would otherwise be entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion granted; appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed June 8, 2011 [CV06]
Blankenship v. Davis Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas J. Blankenship v. Roy Davis, Frank Kapavik and Brent Ewing, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-j-blankenship-v-roy-davis-frank-kapavik-and-texapp-2011.