Thomas Hill v. Cindi Curtin

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas Hill v. Cindi Curtin. Read the opinion of the Court — 792 F.3d 670
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided May 13, 2014·No. 12-2528·Unknown

Opinion

No. 12-2528

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED May 13, 2014 THOMAS HILL, ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) ORDER CINDI S. CURTIN, WARDEN, ) ) Respondent-Appellee. ) ) ) )

BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; BOGGS, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing

of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is

vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

This case will be argued before the en banc court on Wednesday, December 3, 2014. A

briefing schedule will follow.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas Hill v. Cindi Curtin, (6th Cir. 2014).

Thomas Hill v. Cindi Curtin (Thomas Hill v. Cindi Curtin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.