Thomas Hall v. Massey Ferguson, Inc. Stant, Inc.

Eighth Circuit

Thomas Hall v. Massey Ferguson, Inc. Stant, Inc.

5 F.3d 531, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30196, 1993 WL 382031

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 30, 1993

Docket93-1874

StatusPublished

This text of 5 F.3d 531 (Thomas Hall v. Massey Ferguson, Inc. Stant, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas Hall v. Massey Ferguson, Inc. Stant, Inc., 5 F.3d 531, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30196, 1993 WL 382031 (8th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

5 F.3d 531
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Thomas HALL, Appellant,
v.
Massey FERGUSON, Inc.; Stant, Inc., Appellees.

No. 93-1874.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: September 20, 1993.
Filed: September 30, 1993.

Before JOHN R. GIBSON, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Hall appeals pro se from the district court's1 orders granting judgment as a matter of law in favor of Stant, Inc., at the close of Hall's case, and granting Massey Ferguson, Inc.'s motion for judgment as a matter of law following a jury verdict in favor of Hall. Hall has not provided a copy of the trial transcript. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b). Thus, we are unable to review Hall's arguments on appeal. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See 8th Cir. R. 3C.

1

The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

5 F.3d 531
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Thomas HALL, Appellant,
v.
Massey FERGUSON, Inc.; Stant, Inc., Appellees.

No. 93-1874.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: September 20, 1993.
Filed: September 30, 1993.

Before JOHN R. GIBSON, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Hall appeals pro se from the district court's1 orders granting judgment as a matter of law in favor of Stant, Inc., at the close of Hall's case, and granting Massey Ferguson, Inc.'s motion for judgment as a matter of law following a jury verdict in favor of Hall. Hall has not provided a copy of the trial transcript. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b). Thus, we are unable to review Hall's arguments on appeal. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See 8th Cir. R. 3C.

1

The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 F.3d 531, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30196, 1993 WL 382031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-hall-v-massey-ferguson-inc-stant-inc-ca8-1993.