Thomas H. Quinn, Inc. v. Realty Investment Co.

274 A.2d 352, 261 Md. 308, 1971 Md. LEXIS 1084
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 10, 1971·No. No. 393·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Maryland Rule 828 b 1 a requires that the printed extract shall include “the judgment appealed from together with the opinion or charge of the lower court, if any.” [309] In this case, in which the appellant seeks to strike down Rule 542 of the Sixth Circuit which provides that the right of removal is waived unless a written suggestion of removal is filed within 45 days after the cause is at issue, the parties agreed upon a statement of undisputed facts under Rule 828 g but neither brief nor extract contains the judgment appealed from. We deem it appropriate to dismiss the appeal under Rule 828 i; Roy v. Hyde, 261 Md. 283, 274 A.2d 389 (1970).

Appeal dismissed, costs to be paid by wppellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas H. Quinn, Inc. v. Realty Investment Co., 274 A.2d 352, 261 Md. 308, 1971 Md. LEXIS 1084 (Md. 1971).

274 A.2d 352 (Thomas H. Quinn, Inc. v. Realty Investment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shreffler v. Morris
277 A.2d 62 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1971)