Thomas H. Quinn, Inc. v. Realty Investment Co.

274 A.2d 352, 261 Md. 308, 1971 Md. LEXIS 1084
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMarch 10, 1971
DocketNo. 393
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 274 A.2d 352 (Thomas H. Quinn, Inc. v. Realty Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas H. Quinn, Inc. v. Realty Investment Co., 274 A.2d 352, 261 Md. 308, 1971 Md. LEXIS 1084 (Md. 1971).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Maryland Rule 828 b 1 a requires that the printed extract shall include “the judgment appealed from together with the opinion or charge of the lower court, if any.” [309]*309In this case, in which the appellant seeks to strike down Rule 542 of the Sixth Circuit which provides that the right of removal is waived unless a written suggestion of removal is filed within 45 days after the cause is at issue, the parties agreed upon a statement of undisputed facts under Rule 828 g but neither brief nor extract contains the judgment appealed from. We deem it appropriate to dismiss the appeal under Rule 828 i; Roy v. Hyde, 261 Md. 283, 274 A.2d 389 (1970).

Appeal dismissed, costs to be paid by wppellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shreffler v. Morris
277 A.2d 62 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 A.2d 352, 261 Md. 308, 1971 Md. LEXIS 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-h-quinn-inc-v-realty-investment-co-md-1971.