Thomas G. Plant Co. v. Hamburger

153 F. 232, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5090
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri·Decided February 4, 1907·No. No. 5,197·Published

Opinion

FINKELNBURG, District Judge.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of the Same Complainant v. May Mercantile Company (No. 5,196) 153 Fed. 229, and grows out of the same transaction. Although the evidence in this case varies in some particulars from that presented in the case of the Same Complainant v. May Mercantile Company, still I think the record presents substantially the same situation and calls for the same conclusions, so that following the general reasoning indicated in my memorandum filed in the May Company Case I decide this case in the same way.

A decree may be entered against defendants for an injunction and an accounting, and such a decree may be prepared by counsel for complainant and submitted to the court for approval.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas G. Plant Co. v. Hamburger, 153 F. 232, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5090 (circtedmo 1907).

153 F. 232 (Thomas G. Plant Co. v. Hamburger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas G. Plant Co. v. May Mercantile Co.
153 F. 229 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri, 1907)