Thomas Florence v. Zack Shelly and Wanette Florence
This text of Thomas Florence v. Zack Shelly and Wanette Florence (Thomas Florence v. Zack Shelly and Wanette Florence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-13-00730-CV Style: Thomas Florence v Zack Shelly, Zack’s Auto Sales, and Wanette Florence Date motion filed*: January 6, 2014 Type of motion: Motion For Leave of Court to File Exhibits/Evidence Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________
Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: January 14, 2014
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas Florence v. Zack Shelly and Wanette Florence, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-florence-v-zack-shelly-and-wanette-florence-texapp-2014.