Thomas F. Miller v. Kenneth L. Kasden

Eighth Circuit

Thomas F. Miller v. Kenneth L. Kasden

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1998

Docket97-2958

StatusUnpublished

This text of Thomas F. Miller v. Kenneth L. Kasden (Thomas F. Miller v. Kenneth L. Kasden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas F. Miller v. Kenneth L. Kasden, (8th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________

No. 97-2958MN _____________

In re: Kenneth L. Kasden, * * Debtor, * ___________________ * * Thomas F. Miller, Trustee, * Appeal from the United States * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Appellee, * * [UNPUBLISHED] v. * * Kenneth L. Kasden, * * Appellant. * _____________

Submitted: April 14, 1998 Filed: April 22, 1998 _____________

Before FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and STROM,* District Judge. _____________

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth L. Kasden appeals from the bankruptcy court's order revoking Kasden's discharge and awarding a monetary judgment in favor of the bankruptcy estate.

* The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation. Appeals that fail to comply with the applicable rules governing briefs are subject to dismissal. See Fed. R. App. P. 28; Slack v. St. Louis County Gov't, 919 F.2d 98, 99- 100 (8th Cir. 1990) (per curiam). Aside from a rambling conclusory argument, Kasden's brief does not comply with Rule 28, and his appeal is subject to dismissal for this reason. Additionally, even if we considered the merits of Kasden's appeal, we would find no basis for reversing the bankruptcy court's order. We dismiss Kasden's appeal and assess double costs against Kasden. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________

No. 97-2958MN _____________

In re: Kenneth L. Kasden, * * Debtor, * ___________________ * * Thomas F. Miller, Trustee, * Appeal from the United States * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Appellee, * * [UNPUBLISHED] v. * * Kenneth L. Kasden, * * Appellant. * _____________

Submitted: April 14, 1998 Filed: April 22, 1998 _____________

Before FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges, and STROM,* District Judge. _____________

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth L. Kasden appeals from the bankruptcy court's order revoking Kasden's discharge and awarding a monetary judgment in favor of the bankruptcy estate.

* The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation. Appeals that fail to comply with the applicable rules governing briefs are subject to dismissal. See Fed. R. App. P. 28; Slack v. St. Louis County Gov't, 919 F.2d 98, 99- 100 (8th Cir. 1990) (per curiam). Aside from a rambling conclusory argument, Kasden's brief does not comply with Rule 28, and his appeal is subject to dismissal for this reason. Additionally, even if we considered the merits of Kasden's appeal, we would find no basis for reversing the bankruptcy court's order. We dismiss Kasden's appeal and assess double costs against Kasden. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Thomas F. Miller v. Kenneth L. Kasden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-f-miller-v-kenneth-l-kasden-ca8-1998.