Thomas ex rel. McCullough v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
198 N.C. 822
Opinion
We perceive no valid reason for disturbing the judgment of nonsuit. The principles and authorities applicable and pertinent are discussed in Gaither v. Clement, 183 N. C., 450, 111 S. E., 782, and Wright v. Thompson, 171 N. C., 88, 87 S. E., 963.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas ex rel. McCullough v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 198 N.C. 822 (N.C. 1930).
198 N.C. 822 (Thomas ex rel. McCullough v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wright v. . Thompson
87 S.E. 963 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
Gaither v. E. H. Clement Co.
111 S.E. 782 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)