Thomas ex rel. McCullough v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
198 N.C. 822
This text of 198 N.C. 822 (Thomas ex rel. McCullough v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thomas ex rel. McCullough v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 198 N.C. 822 (N.C. 1930).
Opinion
We perceive no valid reason for disturbing the judgment of nonsuit. The principles and authorities applicable and pertinent are discussed in Gaither v. Clement, 183 N. C., 450, 111 S. E., 782, and Wright v. Thompson, 171 N. C., 88, 87 S. E., 963.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wright v. . Thompson
87 S.E. 963 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
Gaither v. E. H. Clement Co.
111 S.E. 782 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
198 N.C. 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-ex-rel-mccullough-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nc-1930.