Thomas Eugene Sudds v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 17, 2010·No. 04-09-00764-CR·Published

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00764-CR

Thomas Eugene SUDDS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 274th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 05-1981-CR Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 17, 2010

DISMISSED

On January 27, 2010, appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserted there are no meritorious issues to raise on

appeal. Counsel informed appellant of his right to file his own brief. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d

83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). On February 1, 2010, we issued an order informing appellant that 04-09-00764-CR

if he wished to file a pro se brief, he must do so within sixty days. See Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.

In response, appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss this

appeal. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.2(a).

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas Eugene Sudds v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Thomas Eugene Sudds v. State (Thomas Eugene Sudds v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bruns v. State
924 S.W.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Nichols v. State
954 S.W.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)