Thomas E. Wills v. Robert Brown Theodore Koehler Larry Thornton Joe McMilah William Johnson Dennis Hickey and Charles Anderson

772 F.2d 909, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14118, 1985 WL 13639
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedAugust 29, 1985
Docket85-1600
StatusUnpublished

This text of 772 F.2d 909 (Thomas E. Wills v. Robert Brown Theodore Koehler Larry Thornton Joe McMilah William Johnson Dennis Hickey and Charles Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas E. Wills v. Robert Brown Theodore Koehler Larry Thornton Joe McMilah William Johnson Dennis Hickey and Charles Anderson, 772 F.2d 909, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14118, 1985 WL 13639 (6th Cir. 1985).

Opinion

772 F.2d 909

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
THOMAS E. WILLS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT BROWN; THEODORE KOEHLER; LARRY THORNTON; JOE MCMILAH;
WILLIAM JOHNSON; DENNIS HICKEY; AND CHARLES
ANDERSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

NO. 85-1600

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

8/29/85

E.D.Mich.

APPEAL DISMISSED

ORDER

BEFORE: MARTIN, JONES and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges.

This appeal has been referred to this panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

A review of the record indicates that appellant has appealed from an order and judgment transferring his civil rights action to another district court and dismissing one of seven defendants. The portion of the order transferring the action is interlocutory and nonappealable. Auerbach v. United States, 347 F.2d 742 (5th Cir. 1965) (per curiam); Lemon v. Druffel, 253 F.2d 680, 683 (6th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 821 (1959). The other portion of the order dismissing one defendant is not final and appealable since it did not expressly determine that there is no just reason for delay and did not direct entry of a final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rudd Construction Equip. Co. v. Home Ins. Co., 711 F.2d 54 (6th Cir. 1983); McIntyre v. First National Bank of Cincinnati, 585 F.2d 190 (6th Cir. 1978); Moody v. Kapica, 548 F.2d 133 (6th Cir. 1976); Oak Construction Co. v. Huron Cement Company, 475 F.2d 1220 (6th Cir. 1973).

It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed. Rule 9 d)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
772 F.2d 909, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14118, 1985 WL 13639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-e-wills-v-robert-brown-theodore-koehler-lar-ca6-1985.