Thomas E. Smail v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Thomas E. Smail v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 4, 2018

Docket5D18-753

StatusPublished

This text of Thomas E. Smail v. State (Thomas E. Smail v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas E. Smail v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

THOMAS EARL SMAIL,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D18-753

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 8, 2018

3.801 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.

Thomas Earl Smail, Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order under review without prejudice to Appellant filing an

appropriate motion for postconviction relief as to claims one and eight.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI