Thomas E. Campbell v. City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 30, 2025·No. 2025 CW 0279·Unknown

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

THOMAS E. CAMPBELL NO. 2025 CW 0279 VERSUS CITY OF BATON ROUGE, PARISH JUNE 30, 2025

OF EAST BATON ROUGE

In Re: City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 695811.

BEFORE : PENZATO, WOLFE, AND FIELDS, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. The writ application failed to include a copy of relator’s reply memorandum and/or motion to strike, in violation of Rule 4-5(C)(8) of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.

Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-18.7 & 4-9.

In the event relator seeks to file a new application with this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation, including the missing information noted above, and must comply with Rule 2- 12.2 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. Any new application must be filed on or before July 20, 2025 and must contain a copy of this ruling.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

ocho AD Were

— Pet CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas E. Campbell v. City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge, (La. Ct. App. 2025).

Thomas E. Campbell v. City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge (Thomas E. Campbell v. City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.