Thomas, Donna Renee
This text of Thomas, Donna Renee (Thomas, Donna Renee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-94,194-01
EX PARTE DONNA RENEE THOMAS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1344600-A IN THE 263RD DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life in prison. The First Court
of Appeals affirmed her conviction. Thomas v. State, No. 01-12-00522-CR (Tex. App.—Houston
[1st Dist.] del. Dec. 19, 2013) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for
a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court.
See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that her appellate counsel was ineffective because counsel failed to
challenge the trial court’s ruling allowing the State to introduce into evidence unrecorded oral
statements Applicant made to police. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle her to
relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 2
Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for
findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order appellate
counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means
set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether
Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court
shall appoint counsel to represent her at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If
counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s
name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate
counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make
findings regarding whether laches is applicable to the habeas claim. Carrio v. State, 992 S.W.2d 486
(Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte Perez, 398 S.W.3d 206 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The trial court
may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: October 19, 2022 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas, Donna Renee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-donna-renee-texcrimapp-2022.