Thomas, Donald v. Salmon Brothers, LLC

2019 TN WC 132
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedSeptember 4, 2019
Docket2018-08-0604
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 TN WC 132 (Thomas, Donald v. Salmon Brothers, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas, Donald v. Salmon Brothers, LLC, 2019 TN WC 132 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

Opinion

FILED Sep 04, 2019 02:16 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MEMPHIS

DONALD THOMAS, ) Docket No.: 2018-08-0604 Employee, )

V. )

SALMON BROTHERS, LLC, ) State File No.: 22160-2018 Employer, )

And )

ACE AMERICAN INS. CO., ) Judge Deana Seymour Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court conducted an Expedited Hearing on August 15, 2019, to address Mr. Thomas’s claim for additional temporary disability benefits.’ Salmon Brothers asserted he was not entitled to the requested benefits because it was owed a credit against the temporary disability for mistaken mileage payments.” The Court rejects Salmon Brothers’s argument and holds Mr. Thomas established likelihood of success at a hearing on the merits regarding his request for additional temporary disability benefits.

History of Claim

Mr. Thomas injured his back at Salmon Brothers. He received authorized treatment from Drs. John Hayes and Thomas Giel.

From March 27 to April 3, Dr. Hayes restricted Mr. Thomas from driving due to functional limitations. On April 3, Dr. Hayes released Mr. Thomas to full duty. A week later Mr. Thomas returned to Dr. Hayes. During that visit, Dr. Hayes again restricted Mr. Thomas from driving.

' The parties agreed to a compensation rate of $911.66.

* Salmon Brothers initially denied that any additional temporary disability benefits were owed. However, at the hearing, it agreed it owed temporary disability benefits in the amount of $862.33.

1 Dr. Giel began treating Mr. Thomas on April 26 and restricted him to “[n]o lifting over 40 Ibs.” On May 24, Dr. Giel released Mr. Thomas to full duty.

At the hearing, Mr. Thomas introduced work-status forms noting his restrictions from March 27 to April 2 and from April 10 to May 24. He also introduced check stubs showing temporary disability payments for those periods. The stubs indicated Mr. Thomas received benefits from March 30 to April 2 and from April 20 to May 24.°

Mr. Thomas testified he started a light-duty position in April making $9.00 per hour and that he worked in this light-duty capacity for 94.5 hours over a five-week period. On cross-examination, he denied working for any company other than Salmon Brothers.

For its part, Salmon Brothers agreed it owed Mr. Thomas $1,059.99 in unpaid temporary disability benefits from April 10 through April 20. It also admitted a weekly shortfall of $10.33 in temporary partial disability benefits paid between April 20 and May 24, which totaled $51.65 for the five-week period ($10.33 x 5 = $51.65). However, Salmon Brothers contended it mistakenly paid Mr. Thomas $249.31 for mileage reimbursement. Specifically, it argued Mr. Thomas’s mileage requests showed his medical providers were within fifteen miles of his residence or workplace. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(3)(D(6)(A) (2018). Further, Salmon Brothers argued Mr. Thomas was concurrently employed by XPO Logistics where he earned an average weekly wage of $254.51, which should be considered in calculating the amount of temporary disability benefits it owed.*

In its calculations, Salmon Brothers considered its total underpayment of $1,111.64 ($1,059.99 + $51.65) and its mistaken payment of $249.31 for mileage of $249.31. Based on these calculations, Salmon Brothers contended it owed Mr. Thomas $862.33 in additional temporary disability benefits ($1,111.64 - $249.31).

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law At an Expedited Hearing, Mr. Thomas must provide sufficient evidence that he

would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

* The first payment totaled $520.95 for March 30 to April 2 and the second payment totaled $3,658.30 for temporary benefits at a weekly rate of $731.66 from April 20 to May 24.

* Mr. Thomas testified that the XPO Logistics pay stubs introduced into evidence as Exhibit 3 were connected to a subcontract Salmon Brothers had with XPO. He stated that he might have driven the routes under the subcontract, but he did not receive the money documented in the stubs. Instead, that money went to Salmon Brothers for running the route for XPO.

2 In considering Mr. Thomas’s request for additional temporary disability benefits, the Court first notes his medical providers never totally restricted him from work. Instead, they placed him on restricted duty. Thus, his recovery, if any, is in temporary partial disability benefits (TPD). These benefits are payable during the time the injured worker is able to resume some gainful employment but has not reached maximum recovery. Barrett v. Lithko Contracting, Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 70, at *8 (June 27, 2016). To prove entitlement to these benefits, Mr. Thomas must show his treating physician released him to return to work with restrictions before maximum medical improvement, and Salmon Brothers either (1) could not return him to work within his restrictions or (2) could not provide restricted work for a sufficient number of hours and/or at a rate of pay equal to or greater than his average weekly wage on the date of his injury. See Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7-8 (Dec. 11, 2015).

Here, Mr. Thomas established his medical providers restricted his work activities from March 27 to April 2 and from April 10 to May 24. He received temporary disability benefits from March 30 to April 2 and from April 20 to May 24. However, Mr. Thomas never received temporary disability benefits from April 10 to April 19. Salmon Brothers agreed Mr. Thomas should have received temporary disability benefits during this period. Therefore, the Court finds Mr. Thomas is likely to prevail in proving entitlement to these benefits.

However, the Court declines to use information from the XPO pay stubs to calculate Mr. Thomas’s temporary disability benefits as Salmon Brothers suggested. Mr. Thomas explained that the pay stubs introduced into evidence were connected to a subcontract Salmon Brothers had with XPO. He testified that these stubs did not document any compensation he received that would indicate the wages he might have earned in his disabled condition. Salmon Brothers failed to show otherwise.

Thus, the Court relies on Mr. Thomas’s testimony in calculating his TPD from April 10 to April 19. According to Mr. Thomas, he earned $9.00 per hour for 94.5 hours total over a five-week period encompassing these dates. Thus, he earned approximately $170.10 per week in this role.

Considering these average weekly earnings, the Court turns to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-207(2)(B), which states that TPD is two-thirds of the difference between the average weekly wage of the worker at the time of the injury and the wage the worker is able to earn in the worker’s partially disabled condition. Applying that formula, Mr. Thomas is entitled to $798.66 per week in TPD benefits ($1,367.49 - $170.10 = $1,197.39 x .667 = $798.66), and for the ten-day period between April 10 and April 19, he is entitled to $1,140.94 ($798.66 + 7 = $114.09 x 10 = $1,140.94).

Further, since Salmon Brothers only paid Mr. Thomas at a weekly rate of $731.66

3 for April 20 through May 24, the Court finds he is likely to prevail in proving a shortfall of $67.00 per week ($798.66 - $731.66 = $67.00), which totals $335.00 for that five- week period. Adding $1,140.94 for April 10 to April 19 and $335.00 for underpayment between April 20 and May 24, the Court holds that Mr. Thomas is entitled to $1,475.94 in TPD.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCall v. National Health Corp.
100 S.W.3d 209 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2003)
Jones v. Crenshaw
645 S.W.2d 238 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 TN WC 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-donald-v-salmon-brothers-llc-tennworkcompcl-2019.