Thomas (Deshawn) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided May 1, 2017·No. 72278·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DESHAWN LANIONT THOMAS, No. 72278 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. MAY 01 201 UR ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL VL-ti.0 I V 'CI-

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for appointment of appellate counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas Smith, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

, J. Hardesty

A44C4-0 , J. Parraguirre Stiglich

cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Deshawn Lamont Thomas Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A e 174/2“,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas (Deshawn) v. State, (Neb. 2017).

Thomas (Deshawn) v. State (Thomas (Deshawn) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)