Thomas Daniel Engel v. United States
395 F.2d 207, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6837
Opinion
Appellant’s contention that the order of induction by his draft board had been revoked is not supported by the record. We conclude that no error was committed by the trial court as to the other matters raised on appeal.
Appellant’s request that he now be permitted to be inducted and serve should properly be addressed to the trial court upon the filing of a motion for reduction of sentence under Rule 35 F.R.Cr.P.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas Daniel Engel v. United States, 395 F.2d 207, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6837 (5th Cir. 1968).
395 F.2d 207 (Thomas Daniel Engel v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.