Thomas Daniel Engel v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Thomas Daniel Engel v. United States

395 F.2d 207, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6837

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 21, 1968

Docket23657_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 395 F.2d 207 (Thomas Daniel Engel v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas Daniel Engel v. United States, 395 F.2d 207, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6837 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s contention that the order of induction by his draft board had been revoked is not supported by the record. We conclude that no error was committed by the trial court as to the other matters raised on appeal.

Appellant’s request that he now be permitted to be inducted and serve should properly be addressed to the trial court upon the filing of a motion for reduction of sentence under Rule 35 F.R.Cr.P.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s contention that the order of induction by his draft board had been revoked is not supported by the record. We conclude that no error was committed by the trial court as to the other matters raised on appeal.

Appellant’s request that he now be permitted to be inducted and serve should properly be addressed to the trial court upon the filing of a motion for reduction of sentence under Rule 35 F.R.Cr.P.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

395 F.2d 207, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-daniel-engel-v-united-states-ca5-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack