Thomas Brock v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 22, 2015·No. 03-14-00059-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 22, 2015

NO. 03-14-00059-CR

Thomas Brock, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the

court’s judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment and sentence

that requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment and sentence

to reflect that appellant pleaded not true to the enhancement allegation. The judgment of

conviction, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no

adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas Brock v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Thomas Brock v. State (Thomas Brock v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.