Thomas Bray v. Bank of America

497 F. App'x 685
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 5, 2013·No. 12-2305·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Bray appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to defendants in his quiet title action, removed to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction, and the court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on their counterclaim seeking foreclosure. Following careful de novo review, see Linn Farms and Timber Ltd. P’ship v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 661 F.3d 354, 357 (8th Cir.2011), we conclude that defendants were entitled to summary judgment, both in Bray’s action and on their counterclaim, for the reasons given by the district court. We also find no abuse of discretion in the court’s ruling on Bray’s discovery and re-cusal motions. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas Bray v. Bank of America, 497 F. App'x 685 (8th Cir. 2013).

497 F. App'x 685 (Thomas Bray v. Bank of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MidFirst Bank v. Young
2025 ND 206 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2025)