Thomas Bray v. Bank of America
This text of 497 F. App'x 685 (Thomas Bray v. Bank of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Thomas Bray appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to defendants in his quiet title action, removed to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction, and the court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on their counterclaim seeking foreclosure. Following careful de novo review, see Linn Farms and Timber Ltd. P’ship v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 661 F.3d 354, 357 (8th Cir.2011), we conclude that defendants were entitled to summary judgment, both in Bray’s action and on their counterclaim, for the reasons given by the district court. We also find no abuse of discretion in the court’s ruling on Bray’s discovery and re-cusal motions. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
497 F. App'x 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-bray-v-bank-of-america-ca8-2013.