Thomas Blevins v. Danny King

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 29, 2023
Docket23-6338
StatusUnpublished

This text of Thomas Blevins v. Danny King (Thomas Blevins v. Danny King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas Blevins v. Danny King, (4th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6338 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/29/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6338

THOMAS BLEVINS, a/k/a Tommy Ray Blevins,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DANNY KING, Jail Administrator; FERNIE HYMAN, Food Service Manager,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03064-D)

Submitted: August 24, 2023 Decided: August 29, 2023

Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Blevins, Appellant Pro Se. Bradley O. Wood, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Steven Andrew Bader, Marshall Wall, CRANFILL SUMNER, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6338 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/29/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Blevins appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to

dismiss Blevins’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon review of the record, we discern no abuse

of discretion. See Mey v. Phillips, 71 F.4th 203, 217 (4th Cir. 2023) (“A district court has

wide latitude in controlling discovery, and its rulings will not be overturned absent a

showing of clear abuse of discretion.” (cleaned up)). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s order. Blevins v. King, No. 5:22-ct-03064-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2023). We deny

Blevins’ request for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Diana Mey v. Judson Phillips
71 F.4th 203 (Fourth Circuit, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thomas Blevins v. Danny King, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-blevins-v-danny-king-ca4-2023.