Thomas B. Grayson v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Thomas B. Grayson v. United States

209 F.2d 259

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 15, 1953

Docket11809

StatusPublished

This text of 209 F.2d 259 (Thomas B. Grayson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas B. Grayson v. United States, 209 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case has been heard and considered on the certified record and on the brief of the appellant and the reply brief and oral argument of the United States Attorney and the Appendix to his brief;

And it appearing that there was no error in the proceedings in the district court, resulting in the conviction of appellant by jury verdict of guilty of wilful violation of section 145(a), Internal Revenue Code, section 145(a), Title 26, United States Code; and it appearing that the jury verdict was upheld by the district judge and is supported by substantial evidence;

The judgment of the district court, imposing sentence on appellant following his conviction by jury verdict, is affirmed; and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case has been heard and considered on the certified record and on the brief of the appellant and the reply brief and oral argument of the United States Attorney and the Appendix to his brief;

And it appearing that there was no error in the proceedings in the district court, resulting in the conviction of appellant by jury verdict of guilty of wilful violation of section 145(a), Internal Revenue Code, section 145(a), Title 26, United States Code; and it appearing that the jury verdict was upheld by the district judge and is supported by substantial evidence;

The judgment of the district court, imposing sentence on appellant following his conviction by jury verdict, is affirmed; and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 F.2d 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-b-grayson-v-united-states-ca6-1953.