THOMAS and THOMPSON

27 I. & N. Dec. 556
CourtBoard of Immigration Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 2019
Docket3954
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 27 I. & N. Dec. 556 (THOMAS and THOMPSON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Immigration Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
THOMAS and THOMPSON, 27 I. & N. Dec. 556 (bia 2019).

Opinion

Cite as 27 I&N Dec. 556 (A.G. 2019) Interim Decision #3954

Matter of Michael Vernon THOMAS, Respondent Matter of Joseph Lloyd THOMPSON, Respondent Decided by Attorney General May 28, 2019

U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General

BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h)(1)(i), I direct the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) to refer these cases to me for review of its decisions. The Board’s decisions in these matters are automatically stayed pending my review. See Matter of Haddam, A.G. Order No. 2380-2001 (Jan. 19, 2001). To assist me, I invite the parties to these proceedings and interested amici to submit briefs that address whether, and under what circumstances, judicial alteration of a criminal conviction or sentence—whether labeled “vacatur,” “modification,” “clarification,” or some other term—should be taken into consideration in determining the immigration consequences of the conviction. The parties’ briefs shall not exceed 15,000 words and shall be filed on or before June 28, 2019. Interested amici may submit briefs not exceeding 9,000 words on or before July 12, 2019. The parties may submit reply briefs not exceeding 6,000 words on or before July 12, 2019. All filings shall be accompanied by proof of service and shall be submitted electronically to AGCertification@usdoj.gov, and in triplicate to:

United States Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General, Room 5114 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530

All briefs must be both submitted electronically and postmarked on or before the pertinent deadlines. Requests for extensions are disfavored.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cruz Rodriguez v. Garland
Fifth Circuit, 2023
THOMAS and THOMPSON
27 I. & N. Dec. 674 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 I. & N. Dec. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-and-thompson-bia-2019.