Thomas Allen Powell D/B/A Architecture Unlimited and J. Keith Webb v. Penhollow, Inc., John O. Penhollow, and Yvonne L. Penhollow

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 2, 2015
Docket05-13-01653-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Thomas Allen Powell D/B/A Architecture Unlimited and J. Keith Webb v. Penhollow, Inc., John O. Penhollow, and Yvonne L. Penhollow (Thomas Allen Powell D/B/A Architecture Unlimited and J. Keith Webb v. Penhollow, Inc., John O. Penhollow, and Yvonne L. Penhollow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas Allen Powell D/B/A Architecture Unlimited and J. Keith Webb v. Penhollow, Inc., John O. Penhollow, and Yvonne L. Penhollow, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 05-13-01653-cv FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 2/2/2015 10:23:55 AM LISA MATZ CLERK

No. 05-13-01653-CV

THOMAS ALLEN POWELL d/b/a § IN THE FIFTH FILED IN ARCHITECTURE UNLIMITED, et al. § 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS Appellants § 2/2/2015 10:23:55 AM § COURT OF APPEALS LISA MATZ v. § Clerk § PENHOLLOW, INC., et al. § Appellees § DALLAS, TEXAS

APPELLANTS’ AGREED MOTION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT

Appellants ask the Court to reset oral argument.

A. INTRODUCTION

1. Appellants are Thomas Allen Powell d/b/a Architecture Unlimited and J.

Keith Webb; Appellees are Penhollow, Inc., John O. Penhollow, and Yvonne L.

Penhollow.

2. This appeal is set for oral argument on February 4, 2015 at 3:00 p.m.

3. Appellees agree and are unopposed to the relief sought in this motion.

B. ARGUMENT & AUTHORITIES

4. The Court has authority under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(c)

to reset oral argument.

5. Appellants ask the Court to reset oral argument in this case because

attorney and party J. Keith Webb cannot attend oral argument on the date presently

scheduled for argument. 6. Mr. Webb’s mother-in-law, Judith Seba, passed away on January 31,

2015. A memorial service is planned for Wednesday, February 4, 2015.

Consequently, Mr. Webb will be unavailable to attend oral argument on that date.

7. Appellant’s attorney is a shareholder of The Miller Law Firm. No other

attorney in the firm is able to argue this case because no other attorney is familiar

with the facts of the case or issues on appeal.

8. Oral argument is necessary for the proper presentation of this case

because it will facilitate the Court’s understanding of the underlying factual

scenario and multitude of legal issues raised on appeal.

9. No motion to reset oral argument has been sought or granted in this case.

10.Appellant’s counsel has pre-planned events that will require him to be

out of town on March 4 & 5, March 24 – 30, and May 14 & 15, 2015 and would

preclude him from attending oral argument on those dates.

C. CONCLUSION

11. Appellants respectfully request oral argument be reset to a later date to

allow Appellant’s counsel to attend and present argument.

D. PRAYER

12. For these reasons, Appellants ask the Court to grant this motion and to

reschedule the oral argument in this case to a later date and time.

APPELLANTS’ AGREED MOTION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT PAGE 2 CASE NO. 05-13-01653-CV Respectfully submitted, The Miller Law Firm

/s/ J. Keith Webb J. Keith Webb kwebb@tmlfpc.com Texas Bar No. 00791892 3811 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 1950 Dallas, Texas 75219 (469) 916-2552 Telephone (469) 916-2555 Fax

Attorney for Appellant Thomas Allen Powell d/b/a Architecture Unlimited and Pro Se

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that I have conferred with D. Ray Murphy, counsel for Appellees, on February 2, 2015 and he has agreed and is unopposed to the foregoing Appellants’ Agreed Motion to Reset Oral Argument.

/s/ J. Keith Webb J. Keith Webb

APPELLANTS’ AGREED MOTION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT PAGE 3 CASE NO. 05-13-01653-CV CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing Appellants’ Agreed Motion to Reset Oral Argument was served on Appellees Penhollow, Inc., John O. Penhollow, and Yvonne L. Penhollow, through counsel of record, D. Ray Murphy, 1700 Redbud Blvd., Suite 300, McKinney, Texas by electronic service on February 2, 2015.

APPELLANTS’ AGREED MOTION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT PAGE 4 CASE NO. 05-13-01653-CV

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thomas Allen Powell D/B/A Architecture Unlimited and J. Keith Webb v. Penhollow, Inc., John O. Penhollow, and Yvonne L. Penhollow, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-allen-powell-dba-architecture-unlimited-and-j-keith-webb-v-texapp-2015.