Thomas A. Meersman v. Internal Revenue Service

Fourth Circuit

Thomas A. Meersman v. Internal Revenue Service

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23460, 1995 WL 370774

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1995

Docket95-1372

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 167 (Thomas A. Meersman v. Internal Revenue Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas A. Meersman v. Internal Revenue Service, 59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23460, 1995 WL 370774 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Thomas A. MEERSMAN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-1372.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

June 20, 1995.

Thomas A. Meersman, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, William Sears Estabrook, III, Alice Lizbeth Ronk, Beverly A. Moses, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing, for lack of jurisdiction, his complaint in which he sought review of a decision entered by the United States Tax Court. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Meersman v. Internal Revenue Service, No. CA-93-1980-PJM (D. Md. July 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The Commissioner's motion to dismiss this appeal is hereby denied

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 167
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Thomas A. MEERSMAN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-1372.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

June 20, 1995.

Thomas A. Meersman, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, William Sears Estabrook, III, Alice Lizbeth Ronk, Beverly A. Moses, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing, for lack of jurisdiction, his complaint in which he sought review of a decision entered by the United States Tax Court. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Meersman v. Internal Revenue Service, No. CA-93-1980-PJM (D. Md. July 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The Commissioner's motion to dismiss this appeal is hereby denied

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 167, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23460, 1995 WL 370774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-a-meersman-v-internal-revenue-service-ca4-1995.