Thomann v. Massetl

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Thomann v. Massetl

33 Misc. 753, 67 N.Y.S. 83

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Misc. 753 (Thomann v. Massetl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomann v. Massetl, 33 Misc. 753, 67 N.Y.S. 83 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

While the writing in this case evidenced part of the engagement of the parties, it manifestly does not cover the subject which was especially litigated upon the trial, namely, the understanding as to the weight of the article to be made by the plaintiff. This subject was presented to the court on conflicting evidence, and with the conclusion reached below, we see no reason for interfering.

Present: Bebkmast, P. J., Giegericii and O’Gormam, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

While the writing in this case evidenced part of the engagement of the parties, it manifestly does not cover the subject which was especially litigated upon the trial, namely, the understanding as to the weight of the article to be made by the plaintiff. This subject was presented to the court on conflicting evidence, and with the conclusion reached below, we see no reason for interfering.

Present: Bebkmast, P. J., Giegericii and O’Gormam, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Misc. 753, 67 N.Y.S. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomann-v-massetl-nyappterm-1900.