Thoman v. Ashley

177 So. 2d 205, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2994
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 7, 1965·No. No. 34154·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

When the petition for certiorari was presented we decided to hear argument on jurisdiction and merits.

Now having heard the argument and further studied the briefs we conclude that no conflict has been shown justifying exercise of jurisdiction of this court especially as the petitioner sought a decision of the question whether or not non-suits are still available in our practice while the District Court of Appeal in their opinion in 170 So.2d at page 333 observed that they were “unable to reach the nonsuit question * *

The absence of “direct conflict * * * on the same point of law,” to quote from Sec. 4(2) of Art. V of the Constitution, F.S.A., impels us to deny the petition for certiorari.

Meanwhile this court has decided in Crews v. Dobson, Fla., 177 So.2d 202, opinion filed 7 July 1965, that nonsuits are no longer recognized.

Petition for certiorari is denied.

DREW, Acting C. J., and THOMAS, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOBSON (Retired), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thoman v. Ashley, 177 So. 2d 205, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2994 (Fla. 1965).

177 So. 2d 205 (Thoman v. Ashley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McLean v. McLean
461 So. 2d 1031 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Armellini Express Lines, Inc. v. Sexton
384 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Donnell v. Industrial Fire and Casualty Co.
378 So. 2d 1344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Southern American Fire Insurance Co. v. Pontiac Holding Co.
190 So. 2d 813 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Peaslee v. Michalski
184 So. 2d 497 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
St. Johns River Terminal Co. v. Pickett
178 So. 2d 214 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)