Thomae v. Cain

86 A. 533, 84 N.J.L. 103, 1913 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 112
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 4, 1913·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

The prosecutor was convicted before a justice of the peace in a proceeding taken under sections 26, 27 and 28 of “An act for the settlement and relief of the poor.” Pamph. L. 1911, p. 390.

Section 29 of the act provides that “at any time previous to the hearing of the complaint in the last two sections mentioned, cither party may demand a trial by ¡jury, whereupon said magistrate shall issue a venire facias to summon a. jury of twelve men competent as jurymen to try said complaint.”

The prosecutor made timely demand for a jury, which was denied by the justice because of the refusal of demandant to advance the venire fees. That was erroneous. N. J. Society P. C. A. v. Wilbur, 47 Vroom 266; MacKenzie v. Gilbert, 40 Id. 184.

After such a denial the justice was without jurisdiction to try the case without a jury, and to his judgment certiorari [104]*104will lie. N. J. Society P. C. A. v. Wilbur, supra; MacKenzie v. Gilbert, supra.

The conviction will be reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomae v. Cain, 86 A. 533, 84 N.J.L. 103, 1913 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 112 (N.J. 1913).

86 A. 533 (Thomae v. Cain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Jersey Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Wilbur
69 A. 1010 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1908)