Thomae, Kall & Co. v. Brown

9 Watts 288
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 15, 1840·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rogers, J.

The full and able review of the authorities, bearing on this case, by Mr. Justice Thompson, supersede the necessity of saying more than expressing our concurrence with the conclusions to which he has arrived. A discharge under the insolvent laws is equivalent to a surrender, and wherever the principal is discharged before the bail is fixed, the court will, at any time, permit an ex-onereiur to be entered on the bail piece. For the reasons assigned by the court below, we are of opinion, that the exoneretur was properly entered, and that the bail is entitled to a discharge on payment of costs.

■ Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomae, Kall & Co. v. Brown, 9 Watts 288 (Pa. 1840).

9 Watts 288 (Thomae, Kall & Co. v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DiRuscio v. Popoli
269 Mass. 482 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)