Thoma v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Canterbury
632 A.2d 700, 227 Conn. 910, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 348
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 15, 1993
DocketSC 14830
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 632 A.2d 700 (Thoma v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Canterbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thoma v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Canterbury, 632 A.2d 700, 227 Conn. 910, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 348 (Colo. 1993).
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 643 (AC 11524), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (a) Canterbury Zoning Regulation § 4.12.3 requires, as a condition precedent to subdivision approval, inland wetlands approval; and (b) the zoning regulation conflicts with General Statutes § 8-26?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thoma v. Planning & Zoning Commission
640 A.2d 1006 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
632 A.2d 700, 227 Conn. 910, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thoma-v-planning-and-zoning-commission-of-the-town-of-canterbury-conn-1993.