Thom v. Wilson's
This text of 24 Ind. 311 (Thom v. Wilson's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is a motion here like that in Thom et al. v. Wilson’s Executor, post. p. 323, to strike a bill of exceptions from the record of the court below. We have no jurisdiction to grant such a motion, or to act upon the question presented by the motion. The motion is, therefore, overruled.
A reversal of this case is sought upon the ground that the evidence does not support the finding of the court below. We have looked into the evidence, and are of the opinion that the finding could not have been otherwise.
The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages, and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Ind. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thom-v-wilsons-ind-1865.